Comparison between lymecycline with multidrug therapy and standard multidrug regimen (WHO-MDT) in the treatment of multibacillary leprosy patients: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Hansen's disease or leprosy is a chronic, infectious disease that has locally and globally afflicted all populations. Despite standard treatment with multidrug therapy (WHO-MDT), the incidence of drug resistance has been an increasingly prevalent global problem in leprosy management. This study compared the effectiveness between lymecycline with WHO-MDT and standard WHO-MDT in leprosy treatment. METHODS: The research is a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital from January 2011 to July 2021. Pre- and post-treatment bacillary index, presence of new lesions, nerve function impairment, and leprosy reactions were obtained through chart review. RESULTS: The results showed a significant difference in bacteriological index (BI) in both groups at the end of the treatment. However, a higher reduction in BI was noted for the lymecycline group. For the group that took WHO-MDT alone, BI decreased by 0.7 (P < 0.001) whereas patients who took lymecycline and WHO-MDT had a BI difference of 3 (P < 0.001) upon completion of treatment. A significant decrease in the recurrence of lesions (P = 0.006) and nerve function impairment (P = 0.038) was also noted in the lymecycline group whereas there was no significant difference in leprosy reactions between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Lymecycline 600 mg daily for 3 months can be used as an adjunct in cases of leprosy resistance and treatment failure among multibacillary patients. Lymecycline significantly reduced bacillary index, recurrence of skin lesions, and nerve function impairment through its possible immunomodulatory, antiapoptotic, and neuroprotective effects.

Lymecycline vs. clindamycin plus rifampicin in hidradenitis suppurativa treatment: clinical and ultrasonography evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic therapy remains the first-line treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, literature data on its comparative clinical efficacy and safety are limited. AIM: To investigate the efficacy of tetracycline (lymecycline 300 mg daily) vs. the combination therapy clindamycin and rifampicin (600 mg plus 600 mg daily) by evaluating and comparing the clinical response at the end of antibiotic treatment (10 weeks). METHODS: The study retrospectively analysed 52 patients divided in two groups of 26 patients: Group A received lymecycline and Group B received clindamycin plus rifampicin for 10 weeks. Subjects had mild, moderate and severe HS. The clinical and ultrasonography extent of disease was measured by the Hurley Score, Sonographic Score of Hidradenitis Suppurativa, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), pain visual analogue scale (pain VAS) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The primary outcome was the clinical response at the end of the antibiotic treatment period, according to the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response measure. RESULTS: Both groups showed a significant improvement in IHS4, pain VAS and DLQI from baseline, but this was more marked in Group A. Reductions in nodule counts were similar between the two groups, whereas the number of abscesses and draining tunnels decreased more in Group B. Disease-free survival was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Lymecycline monotherapy and clindamycin plus rifampicin combination are both effective treatments for patients with moderate-severe HS. Nodular-type HS seems to respond better to lymecycline, whereas the abscess/tunnel type seems to respond better to clindamycin plus rifampicin.

Análisis retrospectivo del uso de la cuádruple terapia con bismuto (Pylera(R)) en la práctica clínica real en España / Retrospective analysis of the use of quadruple therapy with bismuth (Pylera(R)) in real-life clinical practice in Spain

OBJETIVO: La resistencia de Helicobacter pylori a los antibióticos es un problema creciente en nuestro medio y es necesario mejorar las tasas de erradicación. La cuádruple terapia con bismuto se ha considerado el tratamiento de primera o segunda línea en el nuevo consenso. Este estudio evalúa el uso de Pylera(R) en un escenario clínico real. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Se llevó a cabo un estudio descriptivo transversal, entre marzo y septiembre de 2016, para evaluar los porcentajes de erradicación de Helicobacter pylori en pacientes tratados con Pylera(R). Los pacientes (naïve o con fallo a terapias previas) fueron tratados durante 10 días. La erradicación fue confirmada usando un test del aliento con urea al menos 30 días después de la finalización del tratamiento. Además se recogieron datos demográficos, clínico-analíticos y relacionados con el tratamiento. RESULTADOS: Fueron incluidos 185 pacientes (51,6±16,19 años); el 63,8% fueron mujeres y el 9,2% tenían historia familiar de cáncer gástrico. La indicación más frecuente fue la dispepsia (55,1%). El 57,8% recibieron Pylera(R) como primera línea de tratamiento. El 95,7% asociaron omeprazol. Se detectó una tasa de erradicación en primera línea de tratamiento del 78,15% por intención de tratar (86,6% por protocolo). No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre pacientes naïve y los tratados previamente. Nueve pacientes abandonaron el tratamiento (4,9%), 7 debido a efectos secundarios leves y 2 por toma incorrecta. CONCLUSIONES: Pylera(R) tiene unas aceptables tasas de erradicación como primera y segunda línea de tratamiento y muestra un adecuado perfil de seguridad

OBJECTIVE: The resistance of Helicobacter pylori to antibiotics is a growing problem in Spain and eradication rates must be improved. The new Spanish consensus considers quadruple therapy with bismuth as first- or second-line therapy. This study evaluated the use of Pylera(R) in real-life clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted to evaluate the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori in patients treated with Pylera(R) between March and September 2016. Patients (naïve or with previous treatment failure) were treated for 10 days. Eradication was confirmed using a breath test with urea 30 days or more after treatment. In addition, demographic, clinical-analytical and treatment-related data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients were included (51.6±16.19 years); 63.8% were women and 9.2% had a family history of gastric cancer. The most frequent indication was dyspepsia (55.1%). Approximately 57.8% received Pylera(R) as first-line therapy, while 95.7% received Pylera(R) in combination with omeprazole. A first-line eradication rate of 78.15% was observed in the intention-to-treat population (86.6% per protocol). There were no statistically significant differences between naïve patients and those previously treated. Nine patients abandoned the treatment (4.9%), 7 due to mild side effects and 2 due to incorrect dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Pylera(R) has acceptable eradication rates in first- and second-line therapy and shows a suitable safety profile

Isotretinoin and lymecycline treatments modify the skin microbiota in acne.

Oral retinoids and tetracyclines have a major role in acne treatment. Here, we report for the first time the effect of isotretinoin and lymecycline therapy on the skin microbiota in cheek, back and armpit swab samples of acne vulgaris patients using 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing. Propionibacterium acnes was the most common in sebaceous areas of healthy and untreated acne skin and more abundant in back than cheek samples. Five taxa, including a Streptococcus taxon, differed significantly between the cheek samples of healthy controls and acne patients, and acne severity was positively correlated with the abundance of Propionibacterium. Both treatments reduced clinical acne grades and the abundance of Propionibacterium, while the abundance of several other taxa was significantly higher in treated cheek samples compared with untreated ones. Less variation was observed in back samples and none in armpit samples. There were no differences in alpha diversity between control and acne patients in any of the sampled skin areas, but the diversity of the microbiota on the cheek and the back was significantly increased after acne treatments. This study provides insight into the skin microbiota in acne and how it is modulated by systemic acne treatment.

Metformin as an adjunct therapy for the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris.

The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate the use of metformin as an adjunct therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne in those not diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) or androgen excess. The authors conducted independent literature searches. Results were limited to clinical trials and randomized controlled trials. Studies with participants diagnosed with moderateto-severe acne vulgaris taking metformin versus placebo or other active treatment were included;studies with participants diagnosed with PCOS or androgen excess were excluded. The authors found three studies consistent with the search guidelines that evaluated the effects of metformin as adjunct therapy in moderate to severe acne vulgaris. In eachstudy, metformin was an effective adjunct therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris.

Treatment of Mycobacterium marinum with lymecycline: new therapeutic alternative?

Skin infections by Mycobacterium marinum are quite rare in our environment and, therefore, little studied. The majority of the lesions appear three weeks after traumas in aquariums, beaches and fish tanks. Lymph node drainage and systematization of the disease are rare and most lesions disappear in about three years. This case aims to show the effectiveness of the treatment used (lymecycline 150 mg/orally/day). This medication may be a new therapeutic option for the treatment of Mycobacterium marinum.

Treatment of Mycobacterium marinum with lymecycline: new therapeutic alternative?

Skin infections by Mycobacterium marinum are quite rare in our environment and, therefore, little studied. The majority of the lesions appear three weeks after traumas in aquariums, beaches and fish tanks. Lymph node drainage and systematization of the disease are rare and most lesions disappear in about three years. This case aims to show the effectiveness of the treatment used (lymecycline 150 mg/orally/day). This medication may be a new therapeutic option for the treatment of Mycobacterium marinum.

Safety and efficacy comparison of minocycline microgranules vs lymecycline in the treatment of mild to moderate acne: randomized, evaluator-blinded, parallel, and prospective clinical trial for 8 weeks.

BACKGROUND: Minocycline and lymecycline are used in the treatment of acne, but there is not enough evidence to support superior efficacy of one of them. METHODS: 170 participants from 14 to 34 years old with mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris were recruited. 84 had 100 mg of minocycline in a single daily dose for 8 weeks and 86 had 300 mg of lymecycline in a single daily dose for 8 weeks. Participants were evaluated at baseline, week 4 and week 8. RESULTS: 65 minocycline and 60 lymecycline patients were evaluable. The last observation carried forward for the count of non-inflammatory lesions changed from 37.5 ± 17.8 to 37.7 ± 17.8 in the minocycline group and from 36.9 ± 15.5 to 33.4 ± 19.3 in the lymecycline group (no significant changes); corresponding changes in inflammatory lesions were from 19.4 ± 12.4 to 12.2 ± 10.0 in the minocycline group and from 20.1 ± 11.3 to 12.6 ± 8.4 in lymecycline group (P< 0.05 comparing baseline vs. final in both groups). Porphyrin counts varied from 899.5 ± 613.9 to 233.5 ± 219.5 in the minocycline group and from 956.9 ± 661.8 to 411.8 ± 411.5 in the lymecycline group (P<0.05 between the groups at study end). 36 (42.9%) patients receiving minocycline suffered 55 adverse events (22 of them gastrointestinal), while 28 (33.3%) lymecycline patients had 37 adverse events (15 of them gastrointestinal). One patient in the lymecycline group withdrew the study due to gastritis, and one more patient in the same group experienced eosinophilia. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences between the groups in non-inflammatory and inflammatory lesion counts, and in the safety profile. Treatment with minocycline induced statistically significant decrease in facial porphyrin counts compared to the group treated with lymecycline (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00988026).

Nasal pemphigoid: a diagnostic dilemma.

Cicatricial pemphigoid is a chronic, systemic, immunobullous disorder affecting mucous membranes. Nasal manifestations of cicatricial pemphigoid are less common than in the rest of the upper aero-digestive tract, and may prove difficult to diagnose and manage effectively. We report one such case presenting with isolated nasal symptoms, in which diagnosis, treatment and ongoing management of the underlying cause was particularly challenging. A literature review was performed to ascertain the incidence of cicatricial pemphigoid and to establish the best evidence-based investigation and treatment.

Is combined oral and topical therapy better than oral therapy alone in patients with moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris? A comparison of the efficacy and safety of lymecycline plus adapalene gel 0.1%, versus lymecycline plus gel vehicle.

This multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded study compared the efficacy and tolerability of a combination of lymecycline 300 mg/day orally and adapalene topical gel 0.1% (n = 118) to lymecycline 300 mg/day orally plus vehicle gel (n = 124) in patients with moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris with both inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions. The primary efficacy end point, total lesion count at end point (last observation carried forward), showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the lymecycline plus adapalene group (P =.0011). The mean decrease in total, inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts was significantly greater at end point in the lymecycline plus adapalene group than in the lymecycline plus vehicle group (P <.01). In addition, a significant difference for inflammatory and total acne lesions was seen sooner in the adapalene plus lymecycline group. In total, 75.5% of patients in the lymecycline plus adapalene group were markedly improved, almost clear or clear of their lesions at week 12, compared with 51.8% of those in the lymecycline plus vehicle group (P <.001). Local cutaneous tolerance was generally good in both groups, although more patients receiving the lymecycline plus adapalene combination experienced cutaneous reactions than those receiving lymecycline plus vehicle. There are relatively few studies comparing the efficacy of combined oral and topical therapy with either individual therapy alone. This study clearly demonstrates that lymecycline plus adapalene combination treatment resulted in a significantly greater mean decrease in the number of inflammatory, noninflammatory and total lesions than lymecycline plus vehicle and was well tolerated.

Antibiotic treatment and long term prognosis of reactive arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a three month course of lymecycline has an effect on the long term prognosis of reactive arthritis (ReA). METHODS: In 1987-88 a double-blind controlled study with three month course of lymecycline/placebo was conducted. 17 of 23 patients treated at the outpatient department of Helsinki University Central Hospital volunteered to take part in a follow up study, where a physical examination were performed, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein, rheumatoid factor, and radiographs of the lumbosacral spine and sacroiliac joints and of symptomatic peripheral joints were examined. RESULTS: 16/17 (94%) patients reported some kind of back pain and 10/17 (59%) peripheral joint symptoms during the follow up. Two patients had unilateral grade 1 sacroiliitis, one patient grade 4 sacroiliitis, and one patient bilateral grade 2 sacroiliitis. In one patient the disease had progressed to ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and in another to chronic spondyloarthropathy. In addition, two patients had small erosions in radiocarpal joints. No statistically significant differences were found between placebo and lymecycline groups in the development of chronic arthritis, sacroiliitis, or AS. CONCLUSION: The results of the initial study showed that long term treatment with lymecycline in patients with acute ReA decreased the duration of arthritis in those with Chlamydia trachomatis triggered ReA, but not in other patients with ReA. Ten years after the acute arthritis one patient had developed AS, and three had radiological sacroiliitis, three patients had radiological changes at peripheral joints. Long term lymecycline treatment did not change the natural history of the disease.

Acné: nuevas tendencias / Acne: new tendencies

La acné es una enfermedad muy frecuente que aparece alrededor de la pubertad y se caracteriza por su polimorfismo lesional y su cronicidad. Se la divide en grados de severidad y según los mismos se determina la terapéutica adecuada. Tiene un alto impacto psicosocial en quienes la padecen por lo cual es muy importante el vínculo que se establece entre el paciente y su médico, lo cual redundará en una buena aceptación del tratamiento y una mejor respuesta por parte del paciente. En los últimos años se ha avanzado en el conocimiento de su etiopatogenia, lo cual permitió un entendimiento más profundo de la enfermedad. La tendencia actual es la de combinar diferentes drogas que tengan influencia sobre diferentes etiopatogénicos de la acné. Se ha comprobado que de este modo la respuesta es más rápida y el tratamiento menos tóxico (AU)

Lymecycline in the treatment of acne: an efficacious, safe and cost-effective alternative to minocycline.

A comparison of efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of lymecycline and minocycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris has been addressed. This was a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group trial involving patients with moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris, receiving either lymecycline or minocycline for 12 weeks. Efficacy and safety evaluation was performed at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, and 12 and completed by a pharmacoeconomic analysis including week 12 data. One hundred and thirty-six patients were enrolled. At week 12, the mean percent reductions in inflammatory count were 63 % and 65 %, and for total lesions counts 58 % and 56 % for lymecycline and for minocycline respectively. Median percent reduction in non-inflammatory count were 54 % and 47 % for lymecycline and for minocycline respectively. Eighty-seven per cent of all patients tolerated the treatments well. Treatment with lymecycline was found to be 4 times more cost-effective than with minocycline. Results showed that lymecycline has a comparable efficacy and safety profile to minocycline while being 4 times more cost-effective.

Lymecycline and minocycline in inflammatory acne: a randomized, double-blind intent-to-treat study on clinical and in vivo antibacterial efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Some antibiotics represent a mainstay in acne treatment. However, studies comparing their efficacies are rare. AIM: To evaluate the clinical and in vivo antibacterial effect of lymecycline and minocycline at different dosages. METHOD: Eighty-six patients with moderate to severe acne were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, intent-to-treat study comparing in three parallel groups the effect of (1) lymecycline 300 mg daily for 12 weeks, (2) minocycline 50 mg daily for 12 weeks and (3) minocycline 100 mg daily for 4 weeks followed by 50 mg daily for 8 weeks. Evaluations were made at the screening visit and at five on-treatment visits. They consisted of clinical counts of acne lesions and evaluations of bacterial viability using dual flow cytometry performed on microorganisms collected from sebaceous infundibula by cyanoacrylate strippings. RESULTS: Patients receiving minocycline 100/50 mg had the best clinical outcome, particularly in the reduction of the number of papules. By the end of the trial, the microbial response to minocycline 100/ 50 mg was also superior to either of the other two treatments. There were less live and more dead bacteria. CONCLUSION: In this trial, minocycline 100/50 mg was superior for the treatment of inflammatory acne when compared to lymecycline 300 mg and minocycline 50 mg.